Every single ally in this conflict says that "...we went into DRC Congo for security reasons." Rwanda and Uganda emphasize 　securing their borders with DRC, just to go there to destroy all rebel camps backed by te DRC government. Other government allies like Zimbabwe, Namibia and others use the words "safety and security of the region".

But, is it possible to secure a such national border without getting involved in fighting/war. Just secure all countries boundaries.That is all. But, then, the issue of mineral resources comes in, and implications of many other actors, especially international countries through international aid agencies　for development and trade, just to mention a few. Another aspect and involvement of international actor/parties, is the projection of the European (Anglo-French) tribal feud over linguistic, cultural, and economic influence in Africa. Uganda/ Tutsi/Banyamulenge/Kabila Anglophiles are pitted against Hutu and former dictator Mobutu’s Francophiles (at the beginning and escalation of the conflict in 1990's), with the Western media traditionally dominated by France as area specialists, according to many experts like Prof. Johan Galtung.

All the time, the conflict in Eastern Congo seems to focus on Banyamulenge issues. But there is another 　hidden issue of the　repeated hostilities in that region, because 　after overthrowing Mobutu’s regime, Kabila’s (senior)regime did not get well long with Banyamulenge for long time, while Kabila himself was fighting for Banyamulenge rights. And then the second Banyamulenge liberation war begun two years later (1998) and again their former ally is Kabila until now. And still Rwanda and Uganda are implicated in a such a war, and many European countries and the USA are among direct or hidden antagonists.

What is really the root cause of this conflict which implies all those countries?

The transcendence look shows that many efforts have been conducted, but in vain. Then this idea comes in: What about the presence of great nations (UK/USA/France)and regional　mining agencies in this region?

The answer is that the fact of enormous presence of natural resources in DRC, especially in the Eastern region, is another fundamenta.l key issue of this conflict. The rest and challenging issue is to deal with rational utilisation and sharing equaly the benefits of precious natural resources for the well being of Congolese people.

The elections held in summer 2006 in DRC wer a plier of peace, among others. But elections only cannot solve the problem. Many other peace alternatives have been taken like cease fire and peace accords, demobilization, demilitarisation, repatriation and reintegration and so forth. But all of this seems to be a flat compromise.

Despite that general elections held, hostilities are still going on. The superficial recognition of Banyamulenge as Congolese, like others, did not respond to the conflict in the Eastern region of DRC, and all so called peace process seems to be negative transcendence because the conflict is still there, and the worst is yet to come to a region in tragedy. War in this region is inevitable, and more lives of innocent civilians will be lost. Enormous war crimes and war against humanity will set new records in an environment seriously in danger of misusing its natural resources etc.